| Pages: [1] 2 3 |
1. Decline in numbers... starting to turn into RAPID!!! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Can I just say from this guy's unimportant perspective that maybe EVE as a game has been a let-down more recently? Look I don't know how to fix it or whether game mechanics or sov warfare or anything else is the right move to fix the apparent lac...
- by Joe Themachine - at 2015.10.22 05:55:44
|
2. Market Deliveries..huh - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Paranoid Loyd wrote: I am fairly certain that items only go into market deliveries if they are related to the corp. Market deliveries can be viewed from the corproration assets tab. That would actually make a lot of sense. Thanks for the help.
- by Joe Themachine - at 2015.10.08 19:56:03
|
3. Market Deliveries..huh - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
So...is it me or do items in the Market Deliveries not show up on your assets panel? I've been away for quite some time from EVE, and I come back, and apparently I had left some buy orders on the market. Randomly today I'm at a station, and I fi...
- by Joe Themachine - at 2015.10.08 18:53:27
|
4. Sticky:Dev blog: Politics by Other Means: Sovereignty Phase Two - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Look, I like the new system in that it takes out the shooting of structures out of the equation and replaces it with the entosis system, but for God's sake, the whole reinforcement and timer system defeats the purpose of being able to wardec large...
- by Joe Themachine - at 2015.03.17 19:59:13
|
5. New Sov Holding Alliance Needs Corps/New Members - in Alliance and Corporation Recruitment Center [original thread]
will you accept up and coming indy/research/exploration corps? we'd really like the backing of a small alliance to help with our recruitment strategy and you guys sound great for us. Feel free to reach out in game, or let me know who to contact.
- by Joe Themachine - at 2015.03.16 22:26:35
|
6. Sticky:Dev blog: Politics by Other Means: Sovereignty Phase Two - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
For God's sake CCP....sometimes I think you guys want to complicate things just for the sake of complication...All that wont work..just get rid of reinforcement mode, get rid of all time delays, and have it so that if you sit on it for x hours, it...
- by Joe Themachine - at 2015.03.04 17:12:09
|
7. Voting Call: Part 2 of First Arek'Jaalan Symposium (YC 116/117) - in Intergalactic Summit [original thread]
Valerie Valate wrote: So how about those results, eh ? still working contacting members...I was away for 2 weeks as well so slow but sure progress...:)
- by Joe Themachine - at 2014.12.15 22:42:33
|
8. Voting Call: Part 2 of First Arek'Jaalan Symposium (YC 116/117) - in Intergalactic Summit [original thread]
Miyamoto Takedi wrote: Seems to me that the proposal to leave everything the same was made before the end of the process, if the other thread is still relevant. It was simply dismissed out of hand. Now, Joe seems to say that if the proposal ha...
- by Joe Themachine - at 2014.11.20 09:03:53
|
9. Voting Call: Part 2 of First Arek'Jaalan Symposium (YC 116/117) - in Intergalactic Summit [original thread]
Gehen Sealbreaker wrote: Rhavas wrote: I think you're lacking a quorum here. I also think your timing could not be worse - with Tukoss an open question I think your deadline is premature. In addition the lack of key participants who are the ...
- by Joe Themachine - at 2014.11.19 20:01:40
|
10. Voting Call: Part 2 of First Arek'Jaalan Symposium (YC 116/117) - in Intergalactic Summit [original thread]
only a few days left till we close the vote. vote now or for at least 1 year hold your peace!
- by Joe Themachine - at 2014.11.18 07:48:48
|
11. Voting Call: Part 2 of First Arek'Jaalan Symposium (YC 116/117) - in Intergalactic Summit [original thread]
Valerie Valate wrote: I am in no way vain enough to vote for my own, brilliant, suggestions. I would not take it as vanity at all. what if your proposals lose by 1 vote? I think you should vote.
- by Joe Themachine - at 2014.11.13 23:42:39
|
12. Voting Call: Part 2 of First Arek'Jaalan Symposium (YC 116/117) - in Intergalactic Summit [original thread]
hi everyone: It's been pointed out to me that some of the current members of A'J are upset that there is no "do nothing option" that allows A'J to maintain the status quo, so I just wanted to clarify 2 things: I only listed the proposals that we...
- by Joe Themachine - at 2014.11.12 22:36:07
|
13. Sticky:Dev blog: Sleeper Cache exploration sites & Polarized weapon... - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
can you tell us abotu the blueprints for these? Where will they be found? Will they be dropped in sleeper sites? Also will they be BPCs or full BP? Thanks. I love the changes.
- by Joe Themachine - at 2014.11.12 03:06:26
|
14. First Arek'Jaalan Symposium : Restructuring & Leadership - Y... - in Intergalactic Summit [original thread]
I have to yet again agree with Gehen. The simple way to keep everything as is is to vote everything down - not voting is silent agreement to the majority decision of the actual voters - it constitutes a mandate to continue. Regarding the 15 vote ...
- by Joe Themachine - at 2014.11.11 19:49:43
|
15. Voting Call: Part 2 of First Arek'Jaalan Symposium (YC 116/117) - in Intergalactic Summit [original thread]
Norman Vales wrote: The voting clearly needs careful thought. From what I can tell after a brief review, there appears to be an implied option locking mechanic. Yes, pretty much. Some of the proposals are not compatible with other proposals....
- by Joe Themachine - at 2014.11.11 19:29:51
|
16. Voting Call: Part 2 of First Arek'Jaalan Symposium (YC 116/117) - in Intergalactic Summit [original thread]
Gehen Sealbreaker wrote: Thank you Joe for this extensive work. I will, too, take some time to ponder all this and will vote in a few days. A quick question: are we allowed, since this format want to avoid multi-stage votes, to have the resul...
- by Joe Themachine - at 2014.11.11 19:26:39
|
17. Voting Call: Part 2 of First Arek'Jaalan Symposium (YC 116/117) - in Intergalactic Summit [original thread]
Overall Structure GÇô Section I Item 1 GÇô General vs. Scientific Council Option 1.A: There shall be a governing general council made up by elections of project leads and an executive officer. The council (collectively) have a ...
- by Joe Themachine - at 2014.11.11 07:18:04
|
18. First Arek'Jaalan Symposium : Restructuring & Leadership - Y... - in Intergalactic Summit [original thread]
Fellow AGÇÖJs. Thank you so much for your patience and for your awesome participation in part of the symposium. It is now time to vote on the proposals outlined herein. I hereby call part 1 of the First Arek'Jaalan Symposium: Restructuring & L...
- by Joe Themachine - at 2014.11.11 07:06:59
|
19. Voting Call: Part 2 of First Arek'Jaalan Symposium (YC 116/117) - in Intergalactic Summit [original thread]
I hereby call order to the second part of the first Arek'Jaalan symposium of YC116-YC117 as mandated by internal community communication, and upon receipt of 15 "Yes" votes from members of the Arek'Jaalan project, and upon allowing for sufficie...
- by Joe Themachine - at 2014.11.11 07:05:23
|
20. First Arek'Jaalan Symposium : Restructuring & Leadership - Y... - in Intergalactic Summit [original thread]
Today is the last day that this part of the symposium will be live. I will take 24-48 hours (starting tomorrow) to parse, compile, and outline all relevant proposals emanating from this forum, and begin the second part of the symposium which will ...
- by Joe Themachine - at 2014.10.31 23:11:40
|
| Pages: [1] 2 3 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |